AB206,41 Section 41 . 94.67 (15r) of the statutes is repealed.

AB206,42 Section 42 . 97.02 of the statutes is amended to read:

AB206,16,12 97.02 Standards; adulterated food. For the purposes of this chapter, a food is adulterated if it is adulterated within the meaning of 21 USC 342, except that the department may not consider a food to be adulterated solely because it contains industrial hemp, as defined in s. 94.67 (15r) (15c), or an industrial a hemp product.

AB206,43 Section 43 . 182.001 (3) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB206,16,17 182.001 (3) Prohibited activities. Those farming operations prohibited under this section are the production of dairy products not including the processing of such dairy products; the production of cattle, hogs and sheep; and the production of wheat, field corn, barley, oats, rye, hay, pasture, soybeans, millet and, sorghum, and hemp.

AB206,44 Section 44 . 340.01 (50m) (e) of the statutes is repealed.

AB206,45 Section 45 . 343.305 (8) (b) 2. g. of the statutes is amended to read:

AB206,16,22 343.305 (8) (b) 2. g. Whether the person had a valid prescription for methamphetamine or one of its metabolic precursors or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in a case in which subd. 4m. a. and b. apply.

AB206,46 Section 46 . 343.305 (8) (b) 4m. (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB206,17,2 343.305 (8) (b) 4m. (intro.) If, at the time the offense allegedly occurred, all of the following apply, the hearing officer shall determine whether the person had a valid prescription for methamphetamine or one of its metabolic precursors, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol:

AB206,47 Section 47 . 343.305 (8) (b) 4m. a. of the statutes is amended to read:

AB206,17,7 343.305 (8) (b) 4m. a. A blood test administered in accordance with this section indicated that the person had a detectable amount of methamphetamine , or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol but did not have a detectable amount of any other restricted controlled substance in his or her blood.

AB206,48 Section 48 . 343.305 (8) (b) 5. c. of the statutes is amended to read:

AB206,17,11 343.305 (8) (b) 5. c. In a case in which subd. 4m. a. and b. apply, the person had a valid prescription for methamphetamine or one of its metabolic precursors, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.

AB206,49 Section 49 . 346.63 (1) (d) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB206,17,19 346.63 (1) (d) In an action under par. (am) that is based on the defendant allegedly having a detectable amount of methamphetamine, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in his or her blood, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for methamphetamine or one of its metabolic precursors, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.

AB206,50 Section 50 . 346.63 (2) (b) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:

AB206,18,2 346.63 (2) (b) 2. In an action under par. (a) 3. that is based on the defendant allegedly having a detectable amount of methamphetamine, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in his or her blood, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for methamphetamine or one of its metabolic precursors, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.

AB206,51 Section 51 . 348.27 (18) (a) 1. f. of the statutes is amended to read:

AB206,18,4 348.27 (18) (a) 1. f. Industrial hemp Hemp, as defined in s. 94.67 (15r) (15c).

AB206,52 Section 52 . 350.01 (10v) (e) of the statutes is repealed.

AB206,53 Section 53 . 350.101 (1) (e) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB206,18,13 350.101 (1) (e) Defenses. In an action under par. (bm) that is based on the defendant allegedly having a detectable amount of methamphetamine , or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in his or her blood, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for methamphetamine or one of its metabolic precursors, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.

AB206,54 Section 54 . 350.101 (2) (d) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:

AB206,18,21 350.101 (2) (d) 2. In an action under par. (bm) that is based on the defendant allegedly having a detectable amount of methamphetamine, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in his or her blood, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for methamphetamine or one of its metabolic precursors, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.

AB206,55 Section 55 . 885.235 (1) (d) 5. of the statutes is repealed.

AB206,56 Section 56 . 939.22 (33) (e) of the statutes is repealed.

AB206,57 Section 57 . 940.09 (2) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB206,19,8 940.09 (2) (b) In any action under sub. (1) (am) or (cm) or (1g) (am) or (cm) that is based on the defendant allegedly having a detectable amount of methamphetamine or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in his or her blood, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for methamphetamine or one of its metabolic precursors or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.