SB377,51 Section 51 . 30.681 (1) (bn) of the statutes is renumbered 30.681 (1) (bn) 1.

SB377,52 Section 52 . 30.681 (1) (bn) 2. of the statutes is created to read:

SB377,20,19 30.681 (1) (bn) 2. A person who has not attained the legal age, as defined in s. 961.70 (2), may not engage in the operation of a motorboat while he or she has a tetrahydrocannabinols concentration of more than 0.0 but less than 5.0.

SB377,53 Section 53 . 30.681 (1) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,21,4 30.681 (1) (c) Related charges. A person may be charged with and a prosecutor may proceed upon a complaint based upon a violation of any combination of par. (a) or (b) 1., 1g., 1m., or 2. for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence. If the person is charged with violating any combination of par. (a) or (b) 1., 1g., 1m., or 2., the offenses shall be joined. If the person is found guilty of any combination of par. (a) or (b) 1., 1g., 1m., or 2. for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence, there shall be a single conviction for purposes of sentencing and for purposes of counting convictions under s. 30.80 (6) (a) 2. and 3. Paragraphs (a) and (b) 1., 1g., 1m., and 2. each require proof of a fact for conviction which the others do not require.

SB377,54 Section 54 . 30.681 (1) (d) of the statutes is renumbered 30.681 (1) (d) 1. and amended to read:

SB377,21,13 30.681 (1) (d) 1. In an action under par. (b) 1m. that is based on the defendant allegedly having a detectable amount of methamphetamine, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in his or her blood, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for methamphetamine or one of its metabolic precursors, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.

SB377,55 Section 55 . 30.681 (1) (d) 2. of the statutes is created to read:

SB377,21,19 30.681 (1) (d) 2. In an action under par. (b) 1g. or (bn) 2. that is based on the defendant allegedly having a prohibited tetrahydrocannabinols concentration, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for tetrahydrocannabinol or he or she was a qualifying patient, as defined in s. 50.80 (6).

SB377,56 Section 56 . 30.681 (2) (b) (title) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,21,22 30.681 (2) (b) (title) Causing injury after using a controlled substance or, alcohol, or tetrahydrocannabinols.

SB377,57 Section 57 . 30.681 (2) (b) 1g. of the statutes is created to read:

SB377,21,25 30.681 (2) (b) 1g. No person who has a tetrahydrocannabinols concentration of 5.0 or more may cause injury to another person by the operation of a motorboat.

SB377,58 Section 58. 30.681 (2) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,22,11 30.681 (2) (c) Related charges. A person may be charged with and a prosecutor may proceed upon a complaint based upon a violation of any combination of par. (a) or (b) 1., 1g., 1m., or 2. for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence. If the person is charged with violating any combination of par. (a) or (b) 1., 1g., 1m., or 2. in the complaint, the crimes shall be joined under s. 971.12. If the person is found guilty of any combination of par. (a) or (b) 1., 1g., 1m., or 2. for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence, there shall be a single conviction for purposes of sentencing and for purposes of counting convictions under s. 30.80 (6) (a) 2. and 3. Paragraphs (a) and (b) 1., 1g., 1m., and 2. each require proof of a fact for conviction which the others do not require.

SB377,59 Section 59 . 30.681 (2) (d) 1. a. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,22,20 30.681 (2) (d) 1. a. In an action under this subsection for a violation of the intoxicated boating law where the defendant was operating a motorboat that is not a commercial motorboat, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the injury would have occurred even if he or she had been exercising due care and he or she had not been under the influence of an intoxicant or did not have an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more or a tetrahydrocannabinols concentration of 5.0 or more or a detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in his or her blood.

SB377,60 Section 60 . 30.681 (2) (d) 1. b. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,23,3 30.681 (2) (d) 1. b. In an action under par. (b) 1m. that is based on the defendant allegedly having a detectable amount of methamphetamine, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in his or her blood, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for methamphetamine or one of its metabolic precursors, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.

SB377,61 Section 61 . 30.681 (2) (d) 1. c. of the statutes is created to read:

SB377,23,9 30.681 (2) (d) 1. c. In an action under par. (b) 1g. that is based on the defendant allegedly having a prohibited tetrahydrocannabinols concentration, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for tetrahydrocannabinol or he or she was a qualifying patient, as defined in s. 50.80 (6).

SB377,62 Section 62 . 30.684 (4) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,23,20 30.684 (4) Admissibility; effect of test results; other evidence. The results of a chemical test required or administered under sub. (1), (2) or (3) are admissible in any civil or criminal action or proceeding arising out of the acts committed by a person alleged to have violated the intoxicated boating law on the issue of whether the person was under the influence of an intoxicant or the issue of whether the person had alcohol concentrations or tetrahydrocannabinols concentrations at or above specified levels or a detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in his or her blood. Results of these chemical tests shall be given the effect required under s. 885.235. This section does not limit the right of a law enforcement officer to obtain evidence by any other lawful means.

SB377,63 Section 63 . 30.80 (6) (d) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,24,5 30.80 (6) (d) Alcohol, controlled substances or controlled substance analogs, or tetrahydrocannabinols; examination. In addition to any other penalty or order, a person who violates s. 30.681 (1) or (2) or 30.684 (5) or who violates s. 940.09 or 940.25 if the violation involves the operation of a motorboat, shall be ordered by the court to submit to and comply with an assessment by an approved public treatment facility for an examination of the person's use of alcohol, controlled substances or controlled substance analogs, or tetrahydrocannabinols. Intentional failure to comply with an assessment ordered under this paragraph constitutes contempt of court, punishable under ch. 785.

SB377,64 Section 64 . 49.148 (4) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,24,21 49.148 (4) (a) A Wisconsin works Works agency shall require a participant in a community service job or transitional placement who, after August 22, 1996, was convicted in any state or federal court of a felony that had as an element possession, use or distribution of a controlled substance to submit to a test for use of a controlled substance as a condition of continued eligibility. If the test results are positive, the Wisconsin works Works agency shall decrease the presanction benefit amount for that participant by not more than 15 percent for not fewer than 12 months, or for the remainder of the participant's period of participation in a community service job or transitional placement, if less than 12 months. If, at the end of 12 months, the individual is still a participant in a community service job or transitional placement and submits to another test for use of a controlled substance and if the results of the test are negative, the Wisconsin works Works agency shall discontinue the reduction under this paragraph. In this subsection, “controlled substance” does not include tetrahydrocannabinols in any form including tetrahydrocannabinols contained in marijuana, obtained from marijuana, or chemically synthesized.

SB377,65 Section 65 . 49.45 (23) (g) 5. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB377,25,3 49.45 (23) (g) 5. Require, as a condition of eligibility, that an applicant or enrollee submit to a drug screening assessment and, if indicated, a drug test, as specified by the department in the waiver amendment. The department may not test under this subdivision for tetrahydrocannabinols in any form including tetrahydrocannabinols contained in marijuana, obtained from marijuana, or chemically synthesized.