218.0116(8)(c)(c) The decision of the division of hearings and appeals shall be in writing and shall contain findings of fact and a determination of whether there is good cause for permitting the proposed modification. The division of hearings and appeals shall deliver copies of the decision to the parties personally or by registered mail. The decision is final upon its delivery or mailing and no reconsideration or rehearing by the division of hearings and appeals is permitted. 218.0116(9)(9) Any person in interest aggrieved by a decision of the division of hearings and appeals or an order of the division of banking may have a review of the decision as provided in ch. 227. 218.0116(10)(10) In addition to the licensor’s authority to deny, suspend, or revoke a license under ss. 218.0101 to 218.0163, the division of banking, after public hearing, may issue a special order enjoining any licensee from engaging in any act or practice which is determined by the division of banking to be in violation of any provision of sub. (1), and the division of hearings and appeals may be petitioned to and, after notice and hearing, may issue a special order enjoining a licensee from engaging in any act or practice which the division of hearings and appeals determines to be in violation of any provision of sub. (1). 218.0116 Cross-referenceCross-reference: See also chs. Trans 137, 138, 139, and 140, Wis. adm. code. 218.0116 Annotation“Willful” under s. 218.01 (3) (a) 6. [now sub. (1) (cm)] means intentional. Fraud and malice are not elements. The state need not prove intent to deceive the buyer under s. 218.01 (3) (a) 18. [now sub. (1) (im) 2.]. DOT v. Transportation Commission, 105 Wis. 2d 678, 315 N.W.2d 371 (Ct. App. 1981). 218.0116 AnnotationUnder s. 218.01 (3) (b) [now sub. (2)], the commissioner may conduct a de novo review of a Department of Transportation decision and may substitute the commissioner’s own judgment for that of the department. DOT v. Office of Commissioner of Transportation, 159 Wis. 2d 271, 463 N.W.2d 870 (Ct. App. 1990). 218.0116 AnnotationA manufacturer’s assignment of territory to a dealer is part of their motor vehicle dealer agreement under sub. (8). Racine Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. Division of Hearings & Appeals, 2006 WI 86, 292 Wis. 2d 549, 717 N.W.2d 184, 03-2628. 218.0116 AnnotationPerfect performance is not required to effectuate a “cure” under sub. (1) (i) 1. b. The statutory word “cured” encompasses the meaning of “cured” in contract law: the breaching party is to stop the offending conduct and to substantially perform the contract. Only if the breach is not cured to the level of substantial performance may the injured party terminate the contract. This meaning focuses on the performance of the breaching party, rather than on matters beyond the control of the breaching party, such as the conduct of third parties or on the effects of an economic recession. Volvo Trucks North America v. DOT, 2010 WI 15, 323 Wis. 2d 294, 779 N.W.2d 423, 08-1385. 218.0116 AnnotationSection 218.01 (3) (a) 11. [now sub. (1) (f)] is applicable to manufacturers. Bob Willow Motors, Inc. v. General Motors Corp., 872 F.2d 788 (1989). 218.0116 AnnotationA dealer’s refusal to sell the manufacturer’s products after filing a complaint under s. 218.01 (2) (bd) 2. [now s. 218.0114 (7) (d)] is a violation of that provision, and consequently of s. 218.01 (3) (a) 4. [now sub. (1) (bm)], entitling the manufacturer to treble damages under s. 218.01 (9) (am) [now s. 218.0163]. American Suzuki Motor Corp. v. Bill Kummer, Inc., 65 F.3d 1381 (1995). 218.0116 AnnotationSub. (1) (vm) and (wm) does not define the word “coerce,” but the ordinary meaning is to compel by threat or force, either physically or through economic means. Equating acts that “coerce” with “adverse actions” under sub. (1) (z) would lead to a definition of coerce that is overly broad in some respects and overly narrow in others. Applying the ordinary meaning of the word to this case, the defendant’s automobile dealership incentive program that offered incentives to dealerships that constructed or already had exclusive showrooms was not coercive. Dahl Automotive Onaslaska Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 588 F. Supp. 3d 929 (2022). 218.0119218.0119 Changes in places of business to be reported. 218.0119(1)(1) Before changing the location of a place of business or opening a new place of business in a municipality in which authorized to do business, a licensed dealer, distributor, or manufacturer shall apply to the department of transportation for an amended license. The department of transportation shall issue such license without charge. 218.0119(2)(2) Whenever a licensed dealer, distributor, manufacturer or transporter opens a new place of business, the licensee shall promptly report that fact, including the address of the new place of business, to the department of transportation. 218.0119(3)(3) Whenever a licensed dealer, distributor or manufacturer discontinues or disposes of his or her business, that dealer, distributor or manufacturer shall promptly report that fact to the department of transportation and return the license and registration plates issued. Whenever a licensed dealer, distributor or manufacturer discontinues business due to license suspension or revocation, that dealer, distributor or manufacturer shall surrender the licenses and registration plates to the department of transportation for the suspension or revocation period. 218.0119(4)(4) Any dealer, distributor, manufacturer or transporter who fails to comply with the requirements of this section may be required to forfeit not less than $100 nor more than $200. 218.0119 HistoryHistory: 1999 a. 31 ss. 105 to 109; 2003 a. 215. 218.0119 Cross-referenceCross-reference: See also ch. Trans 138, Wis. adm. code. 218.0121(1m)(a)(a) “Agent” means a person who is employed by or affiliated with a factory or who directly or through an intermediary is controlled by or under common control of a factory. 218.0121(1m)(b)(b) “Control” means the possession, direct or indirect, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of a person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise. “Control” does not include the relationship between a factory and a dealership under a basic agreement filed under s. 218.0114 (7) (a) 1. 218.0121(1m)(c)(c) “Dealer operator” means an individual who is vested with the power and authority to operate a dealership. 218.0121(1m)(e)(e) “Factory” means a manufacturer, distributor or importer, or an agent of a manufacturer, distributor or importer. 218.0121(1m)(f)(f) “Operate” means to directly or indirectly manage a dealership.