NR 422.04(2)(2) General methods. The surface coating or printing emission limitations shall be achieved by one of the following: NR 422.04(2)(a)(a) The application of low solvent content coating or ink technology. NR 422.04(2)(b)(b) A vapor recovery system which recovers the solvent for reuse. NR 422.04(2)(c)(c) Incineration or catalytic oxidation, provided that 90% of the nonmethane VOCs (VOC measured as total combustible carbon) which enter the incinerator or oxidation unit are oxidized to non-organic compounds. NR 422.04(2)(d)(d) An equivalent system or approach demonstrated to reliably control emissions to a level at or below the applicable emission limit and approved by the department. Any approval granted by the department under this paragraph shall be submitted to, and will not become effective for federal purposes until approved by, the administrator or designee as a source-specific revision to the department’s state implementation plan for ozone. NR 422.04(3)(3) High transfer efficiency coating application. NR 422.04(3)(a)(a) Surface coating operations covered under ss. NR 422.09 to 422.11 and 422.15 have the added option of achieving compliance with the emission limitation through the use of an alternative control method or system involving a high transfer efficiency coating application system, either when used alone or in conjunction with low solvent content coating technology. NR 422.04(3)(b)(b) Compliance under the option provided in this subsection must be approved by the department. This requires that all of the following conditions are met: NR 422.04(3)(b)1.1. The design, operation and efficiency of the application system must be certified in writing by the owner or operator and submitted to the department for approval. NR 422.04(3)(b)2.2. The solvent usage per coated part for application system must be less than or equal to the solvent usage per coated part at the applicable emission limitation using baseline transfer efficiency. NR 422.04(3)(c)(c) Each alternative control method or system approval granted by the department under this subsection shall be submitted to, and will not become effective for federal purposes until approved by, the administrator or designee as a source-specific revision to the department’s state implementation plan for ozone. NR 422.04(4)(4) Capture systems. The design, operation and efficiency of any capture system used in conjunction with sub. (2) (b), (c) or (d) shall be certified in writing by the owner or operator. The efficiency of the capture system is subject to approval by the department. For sources subject to an emission limitation under this chapter which is expressed in units of pounds VOC per gallon of coating or ink, excluding water, the efficiency of the capture system shall be great enough to insure that for any day either 95% overall control is achieved or the emissions from the controlled line are less than or equal to the amount determined using the following equation: where:
E is the total allowable daily emissions of VOCs in kilograms (pounds) from all coatings or inks subject to the same numerical emission limitation and applied on the controlled line
i is the subscript denoting an individual coating or ink
n is the number of different coatings or inks applied
Ai is the allowable emission rate for the coatings or inks pursuant to the requirements of this chapter in kilograms per liter (pounds per gallon) of coating or ink, excluding water, delivered to the applicator
Bi is the amount of coating material or ink in liters (gallons), delivered to the applicator during the actual production day
Ci is the volume fraction of solids in the coating or ink, delivered to the applicator during the actual production day
Di is the theoretical volume fraction of solids in the coating or ink necessary to meet the allowable emission rate pursuant to the requirements of this chapter calculated from:
where:
Pi is the density of the VOC used in the coating or ink delivered to the applicator during the actual production day in kilograms per liter (pounds per gallon). If the coating or ink does not contain any VOCs, or if the actual VOC density cannot be demonstrated by the owner or operator, a value of 0.88 kilograms per liter (7.36 pounds per gallon) shall be used for P.
NR 422.04 HistoryHistory: Renum. from NR 154.13 (4) (b) and am. Register, September, 1986, No. 369, eff. 10-1-86; renum. (1) to (3) to be (2) to (4) and am. (3) (a), (b) (intro.) and 1. and (4), cr. (1) and (3) (c), Register, February, 1990, No. 410, eff. 3-1-90; renum. (1) to be (1) (intro.) and am., cr. (1) (a) to (c), am. (2) (d) and (3) (c), r. and recr. (4), Register, December, 1993, No. 456, eff. 1-1-94; am. (1) (a) Register, August, 1994, No. 464, eff. 9-1-94; am. (4) Register, June, 1995, No. 474, eff. 7-1-95; am. (1) (a), (c), (2) (intro.), (d), and (3) (b) (intro.), (c), Register, December, 1996, No. 492, eff. 1-1-97; am. (4), Register, October, 1999, No. 526, eff. 11-1-99; CR 00-174: am. (1) (a), Register August 2001 No. 548, eff. 9-1-01; CR. 02-146: am. (2) (intro.) and (a) Register October 2003 No. 574, eff. 11-1-03; CR 20-088: am. (1) (a) Register May 2022 No. 797, eff. 6-1-22. NR 422.05(1)(a)(a) Subsections (2) and (4) apply to coating applicators and ovens of sheet, can or end coating lines involved in sheet basecoat (exterior and interior) and overvarnish; 2-piece can exterior (basecoat and overvarnish); 2- and 3-piece can interior body spray; 2-piece can exterior end (spray or roll coat); 3-piece can side-seam spray and end sealing compound operations at a facility that is either of the following: NR 422.05(1)(a)1.1. Located in the county of Brown, Calumet, Dane, Dodge, Door, Fond du Lac, Jefferson, Kenosha, Kewaunee, Manitowoc, Milwaukee, Ozaukee, Outagamie, Racine, Rock, Sheboygan, Walworth, Washington, Waukesha, or Winnebago and which has VOC emissions from all can coating lines at the facility, before consideration of controls, exceeding 6.8 kilograms (15 pounds) in any one day. NR 422.05(1)(a)2.2. Located outside of the counties of Brown, Calumet, Dane, Dodge, Door, Fond du Lac, Jefferson, Kenosha, Kewaunee, Manitowoc, Milwaukee, Ozaukee, Outagamie, Racine, Rock, Sheboygan, Walworth, Washington, Waukesha, and Winnebago and which has total VOC emissions from the facility, before consideration of controls, equal to or exceeding 100 tpy.