NR 664.0552(4)(a)(a) The origin of the waste and how it was subsequently managed (including a description of the timing and circumstances surrounding the disposal or release). NR 664.0552(4)(b)(b) Whether the waste was listed or identified as hazardous at the time of disposal or release. NR 664.0552(4)(c)(c) Whether the disposal or release of the waste occurred before or after the land disposal requirements of ch. NR 668 were in effect for the waste listing or characteristic. NR 664.0552(5)(5) The department shall specify, in the license or order, requirements for CAMUs to include all of the following: NR 664.0552(5)(a)(a) Areal configuration requirements. The areal configuration of the CAMU. NR 664.0552(5)(b)(b) Design, operation, treatment and closure requirements. Except as provided in sub. (7), requirements for CAMU-eligible waste management to include the specification of applicable design, operation, treatment and closure requirements. NR 664.0552(5)(c)(c) Minimum design requirements. Except as provided in sub. (6), CAMUs into which wastes are placed shall be designed in accordance with all of the following requirements: NR 664.0552(5)(c)1.1. Unless the department approves alternate requirements under subd. 2., CAMUs that consist of new, replacement or laterally expanded units shall include a composite liner and a leachate collection system that is designed and constructed to maintain less than a 30-cm depth of leachate over the liner. In this section, “composite liner” means a system consisting of 2 components; the upper component shall consist of a minimum 30-mil flexible membrane liner (FML), and the lower component shall consist of at least a 2-foot layer of compacted soil with a hydraulic conductivity of no more than 1x10-7 cm/sec. FML components consisting of high density polyethylene (HDPE) shall be at least 60 mil thick. The FML component shall be installed in direct and uniform contact with the compacted soil component. NR 664.0552(5)(c)2.2. The department may approve alternate requirements if any of the following apply: NR 664.0552(5)(c)2.a.a. The department finds that alternate design and operating practices, together with location characteristics, will prevent the migration of any hazardous constituents into the groundwater or surface water at least as effectively as the liner and leachate collection systems in subd. 1. NR 664.0552(5)(c)2.b.b. The CAMU is to be established in an area with existing significant levels of contamination, and the department finds that an alternative design, including a design that does not include a liner, would prevent migration from the unit that would exceed long-term remedial goals. NR 664.0552(5)(d)(d) Minimum treatment requirements. Unless the wastes will be placed in a CAMU for storage or treatment only in accordance with sub. (6), CAMU-eligible wastes that, absent this section, would be subject to the treatment requirements of ch. NR 668, and that the department determines contain principal hazardous constituents shall be treated to the standards specified in subd. 3. NR 664.0552(5)(d)1.1. Principal hazardous constituents are those constituents that the department determines pose a risk to human health and the environment substantially higher than the cleanup levels or goals at the site. NR 664.0552(5)(d)1.a.a. In general, the department will designate as principal hazardous constituents all of the following: 1) Carcinogens that pose a potential direct risk from ingestion or inhalation at the site at or above 10-3.
2) Non-carcinogens that pose a potential direct risk from ingestion or inhalation at the site an order of magnitude or greater over their reference dose.
NR 664.0552(5)(d)1.b.b. The department will also designate constituents as principal hazardous constituents, where appropriate, when risks to human health and the environment posed by the potential migration of constituents in wastes to groundwater are substantially higher than cleanup levels or goals at the site; when making such a designation, the department may consider factors such as constituent concentrations, and fate and transport characteristics under site conditions. NR 664.0552(5)(d)1.c.c. The department may also designate other constituents as principal hazardous constituents that the department determines pose a risk to human health and the environment substantially higher than the cleanup levels or goals at the site. NR 664.0552(5)(d)2.2. In determining which constituents are “principal hazardous constituents”, the department shall consider all constituents which, absent this section, would be subject to the treatment requirements in ch. NR 668. NR 664.0552(5)(d)3.3. Waste that the department determines contains principal hazardous constituents shall meet treatment standards determined in accordance with subd. 4. or 5. NR 664.0552(5)(d)4.a.a. For non-metals, treatment shall achieve 90% reduction in total principal hazardous constituent concentrations, except as provided by subd. 4. c. NR 664.0552(5)(d)4.b.b. For metals, treatment shall achieve 90% reduction in principal hazardous constituent concentrations as measured in leachate from the treated waste or media (tested according to the TCLP) or 90% reduction in total constituent concentrations (when a metal removal treatment technology is used), except as provided by subd. 4. c. NR 664.0552(5)(d)4.c.c. When treatment of any principal hazardous constituent to a 90% reduction standard would result in a concentration less than 10 times the universal treatment standard for that constituent, treatment to achieve constituent concentrations less than 10 times the universal treatment standard is not required. Universal treatment standards are identified in s. NR 668.48, Table UTS. NR 664.0552(5)(d)4.d.d. For waste exhibiting the hazardous characteristic of ignitability, corrosivity or reactivity, the waste shall also be treated to eliminate these characteristics. NR 664.0552(5)(d)4.e.e. For debris, the debris shall be treated in accordance with s. NR 668.45, or by methods or to levels established under subd. 4. a. to d. or 5., whichever the department determines is appropriate. NR 664.0552(5)(d)4.f.f. For metal bearing wastes for which metals removal treatment is not used, the department may specify a leaching test other than the TCLP (method 1311 of EPA SW-846, incorporated by reference in s. NR 660.11) to measure treatment effectiveness, provided the department determines that an alternative leach testing protocol is appropriate for use, and that the alternative more accurately reflects conditions at the site that affect leaching. NR 664.0552(5)(d)5.5. The department may adjust the treatment level or method in subd. 4. to a higher or lower level, based on one or more of the following factors, as appropriate. The adjusted level or method shall be protective of human health and the environment: