jr57(2) (2)
jr57(2)(a) (a) The text of a proposed constitutional amendment is not subject to change when a joint resolution submits such text for “2nd consideration" after the joint resolution was adopted on “first consideration" by the last preceding legislature, unless appropriate changes are made to revert the status of the constitutional amendment to “first consideration."
jr57(2)(am) (am) While the constitutional amendment has “2nd consideration" status, only the relating clause and those paragraphs of the joint resolution pertaining to the ballot question and to the date of submission to the voters may be changed by amendment.
jr57(2)(b) (b) Because any change in the text of a proposed constitutional amendment before the senate or assembly for “2nd consideration" reverts that proposed amendment to “first consideration" status, any change shall be presented to the senate or assembly in the form of a substitute amendment that, in its title, its resolving clauses, and its instructions for transmittal to the next succeeding legislature, properly sets forth the resultant “first consideration" status of the proposed constitutional amendment.
[rn. from Jt.Rule 55, 1987 SJR-48]
[(2)(intro.) and (b) am. 2001 AJR-15]
[(2)(intro.) and (a) rn. 2011 SJR-2]
jr58 Joint Rule 58. Amendments to U.S. constitution.
jr58(1)(1) Any amendment to the constitution of the United States, submitted to the legislatures of the several states for ratification, shall be considered in the form of a joint resolution.
jr58(2) (2) Every joint resolution to ratify an amendment to the constitution of the United States shall be given 3 readings in each house. The vote on adoption or concurrence shall be a roll call vote with the ayes and noes entered in the journal.
jr58(3) (3) That part of a joint resolution to ratify an amendment to the constitution of the United States which correctly sets forth the text of the proposed amendment may not be amended.
[cr. 1987 SJR-48]
jr59 Joint Rule 59. Explanative notes. In addition to such notes as are required by law or joint rule, explanative notes may be included in revision and correction bills prepared by the revisor of statutes, in reconciliation bills introduced by the committee on organization of either house, and in proposals introduced or offered and in substitute amendments or amendments offered by the joint legislative council or its law revision committee, at the request of the judicial council, and by or at the request of any other official interim study or investigative group. The notes shall be prepared by the requester, shall be factual in nature, shall be as brief as may be and, where feasible, shall follow the section of the proposal or amendment to which they relate. Notes may appear in the original reproduced version of the proposal or amendment only, and may not appear in the Wisconsin Acts or session law volumes unless the chief of the legislative reference bureau determines that including them is essential or in the statutes unless the revisor determines that including them is essential. The notes constitute no part of the proposed act or engrossed or enrolled resolution.
[rn. from Jt.Rule 56, 1987 SJR-48]
[am. 1997 AJR-1]
[am. 1999 AJR-18]
[am. 2001 AJR-15]
[am. 2011 SJR-2]
jr60 Joint Rule 60. Enrolled proposals.
jr60(1)(1) Except as provided in sub. (2), immediately after the passage of any bill, or the adoption of and concurrence in any joint resolution amending the constitution, and in the case of a bill, before it is presented to the governor for approval, the legislative reference bureau shall prepare the number of enrolled copies of the proposal requested by the chief clerk of the house in which the proposal originated. One copy shall be used as the enrolled bill that is presented to the governor or the enrolled resolution that is deposited with the secretary of state. Four copies of the enrolled bill or resolution shall be delivered to the secretary of state. A sufficient number of copies of the enrolled bill or enrolled resolution shall be delivered to the revisor of statutes.
jr60(2) (2) Whenever the legislative reference bureau determines that the text of a proposal passed by the legislature cannot be properly enrolled because of unreconciled conflicts in adopted amendments, the bureau shall report the problem to the committee on organization of the house in which the proposal originated. If the committee on organization concurs with that determination, the committee shall introduce a joint resolution recalling the proposal for further legislative action and the bureau may not enroll the proposal until the legislature acts on the joint resolution recalling the proposal.
[rn. from Jt.Rule 54, 1987 SJR-48]
[(1) rn.am.; (2) cr. 1989 AJR-24]
[(title) and (1) am. 2001 AJR-15]
[(2) am. 2011 SJR-2]
Chapter 7:
REPRODUCTION OF PROPOSALS
jr62 Joint Rule 62. Number of copies.
jr62(1)(1) The joint committee on legislative organization may determine the number of copies of each proposal and amendments thereto to be reproduced on a routine basis unless otherwise provided by joint resolution.
jr62(2) (2) Additional copies of a legislative proposal may be procured by the house in which the proposal originated, as provided in the rules of the house or upon authorization by the committee on organization or chief clerk of that house.
[(title), (1) and (2) am. 1997 AJR-1]
[am. 2001 AJR-15]
[(1) am. 2011 SJR 2]
jr63 Joint Rule 63. Reproduction of engrossed proposals and amendments. Upon the finding by the chief clerk of either house that a proposal or major amendment thereto has been amended in the house of origin to a considerable degree, the chief clerk may instruct the legislative reference bureau to prepare and have reproduced an engrossed copy of the proposal or amendment. In preparing engrossed copy for a proposal the legislative reference bureau shall, if time permits, provide it with a revised analysis. Upon receipt from the legislative reference bureau of the engrossed copy, the chief clerk shall enter that fact in the history file for the proposal. Any subsequent amendments to a proposal ordered reproduced with all adopted amendments engrossed therein shall be drafted to the reproduced engrossed text.
[am. 1987 SJR-48]
[am. 1997 AJR-1]
[am. 2001 AJR-15]
jr64 Joint Rule 64. Display of text in amendatory proposals and acts.
jr64(1)(1) Any proposal, substitute amendment, or amendment that proposes to amend an existing law or legislative rule, and any joint resolution that proposes to amend a section of the state constitution or joint rules, shall display the full text of the unit of the law, rule, or constitution that is being amended, with any matter to be stricken out displayed with a line through the matter, and any new matter displayed with underscoring. This requirement does not apply to:
jr64(1)(a) (a) Reconciliation bills introduced by the committee on organization of either house or revisor's correction or revisor's revision bills.
jr64(1)(b) (b) Appropriation sections that only increase or decrease the amount of an existing appropriation, which shall instead indicate the amount by which the applicable appropriation is to be increased or decreased, and the purpose of the increase or decrease.
jr64(1)(c) (c) Proposals in which identical words are substituted for other words in designated parts of existing law, if the designated parts in which the words occur are enumerated.