Amendment ASA1-AB190

LRBs0079/1

EHS:cjs&amn

2019 - 2020 LEGISLATURE

ASSEMBLY SUBSTITUTE AMENDMENT 1, TO ASSEMBLY BILL 190

August 5, 2019 - Offered by Representatives Tusler and Ohnstad.

AB190-ASA1,1,7 An Act to renumber and amend 281.36 (3r) (a) 1.; to amend 281.36 (3r) (a) 2., 281.36 (3r) (b), 281.36 (3r) (e) and 295.60 (8) (dm) 4.; and to create 281.36 (1) (ad), 281.36 (1) (ae), 281.36 (1) (be), (bf) and (bg), 281.36 (3r) (a) 1. b. and c., 281.36 (3r) (ag), 281.36 (3t) (g) and 281.36 (3w) of the statutes; relating to: wetland mitigation banks, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, providing an exemption from rule-making procedures, and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority.

Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill makes changes to requirements for wetland mitigation banks.

Under current law, the Department of Natural Resources must issue wetland general permits for discharges of dredged or fill material into certain wetlands and may require a person to apply for and obtain a wetland individual permit if DNR determines that conditions specific to the site require additional restrictions on the discharge in order to provide reasonable assurance that no significant adverse impacts to wetland functional values will occur. Under current law, before DNR may issue a wetland individual permit, it must require the restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation of other wetlands to compensate for adverse impacts to a wetland resulting from the discharge, also known as mitigation.

Under current law, there are three methods by which wetland mitigation may be accomplished: 1) purchasing credits from a mitigation bank located in this state; 2) participating in the in lieu fee subprogram; or 3) completing mitigation within the same watershed or within one-half mile of the site of the discharge. A mitigation bank is a system of accounting for wetland loss and compensation in which sites where wetlands are restored, enhanced, created, or preserved generate credits that may be applied or purchased in order to compensate for adverse impacts to other wetlands. Under current law, DNR must approve the establishment of a mitigation bank.

This bill changes the first method of wetland mitigation by limiting credit purchases to only a mitigation bank located in the same hydrologic unit code (HUC) 8 as the wetland impacted by the discharge, if available. Under the bill, an HUC 8 is a watershed delineated by the U.S. Geological Survey using a nationwide system based on surface hydrologic features at the 8-digit subbasin scale. If no available mitigation bank is located in the same HUC 8 as the wetland impacted by the discharge, the bill allows credit purchases to be made from a mitigation bank located within the same bank service area as the wetland impacted by the discharge. Under the bill, a bank service area is the geographic area corresponding to the HUC 6 within which impacts to a wetland from a discharge can be mitigated at a specific mitigation bank as determined in an agreement between DNR and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and referenced in a mitigation banking instrument. Under the bill, an HUC 6 is a watershed delineated by the U.S. Geological Survey using a nationwide system based on surface hydrologic features at the 6-digit basin scale. If no available mitigation bank is located in the same bank service area as the impacted wetland, the bill allows credit purchases to be made from a mitigation bank in the same basin as the wetland impacted by the discharge, meaning the Lake Michigan, Lake Superior, or Mississippi River basin that corresponds to the HUC 2. Under the bill, an HUC 2 is a watershed delineated by the U.S. Geological Survey using a nationwide system based on surface hydrologic features at the 2-digit region scale.

However, despite these limitations on the location of a mitigation bank, the bill allows DNR, in consultation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, to allow credits to be purchased from a different mitigation bank than the one prescribed or allow mitigation to be done through the in lieu fee subprogram rather than by purchasing credits from a mitigation bank if DNR determines it would better serve natural resource goals, such as retaining flood water, improving or restoring wildlife habitat, or more closely matching the impacted wetland type.

This bill requires DNR to establish by rule financial assurance requirements for the construction of mitigation projects by mitigation banks. The bill also establishes the means by which a mitigation bank that has not yet completed construction of a mitigation project and has not been approved by DNR (developing mitigation bank) may sell the credits that the mitigation bank estimates it will have once the mitigation project is complete. Under the bill, a developing mitigation bank may sell these credits if it is in compliance with DNR's financial assurance requirements and if it follows a specific schedule for release of the credits that is established in the bill. The bill allows DNR to authorize a developing mitigation bank to sell its estimated credits at a faster rate than the schedule allows if the bank provides an additional level of financial assurance or if the mitigation is of a type that is less prone to failure, such as wetland preservation or enhancement.

The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:

AB190-ASA1,1 Section 1 . 281.36 (1) (ad) of the statutes is created to read:

AB190-ASA1,3,6 281.36 (1) (ad) “Bank service area” means the geographic area corresponding to the HUC 6 within which impacts to a wetland from a discharge can be mitigated at a specific mitigation bank as determined in an agreement between the department and the U.S. army corps of engineers and referenced in a mitigation banking instrument under sub. (3w).

AB190-ASA1,2 Section 2 . 281.36 (1) (ae) of the statutes is created to read:

AB190-ASA1,3,9 281.36 (1) (ae) “Basin” means the Lake Michigan, Lake Superior, or Mississippi River basin that corresponds to the HUC 2.

AB190-ASA1,3 Section 3 . 281.36 (1) (be), (bf) and (bg) of the statutes are created to read:

AB190-ASA1,3,13 281.36 (1) (be) “HUC 2” means a watershed delineated by the U.S. geological survey using a nationwide system based on surface hydrologic features at the 2-digit region scale (the hydrologic unit code 2).

AB190-ASA1,3,16 (bf) “HUC 6” means a watershed delineated by the U.S. geological survey using a nationwide system based on surface hydrologic features at the 6-digit basin scale (the hydrologic unit code 6).

AB190-ASA1,3,19 (bg) “HUC 8” means a watershed delineated by the U.S. geological survey using a nationwide system based on surface hydrologic features at the 8-digit subbasin scale (the hydrologic unit code 8).

AB190-ASA1,4 Section 4. 281.36 (3r) (a) 1. of the statutes is renumbered 281.36 (3r) (a) 1. a. and amended to read:

AB190-ASA1,4,5 281.36 (3r) (a) 1. a. Purchasing Except as provided in subd. 1. b. and par. (ag), purchasing credits from a mitigation bank located in this state the same HUC 8 as the wetland impacted by the discharge.

AB190-ASA1,5 Section 5 . 281.36 (3r) (a) 1. b. and c. of the statutes are created to read:

AB190-ASA1,4,10 281.36 (3r) (a) 1. b. Except as provided in subd. 1. c. and par. (ag), if credits are not available to be purchased as provided under subd. 1. a., credits may be purchased from a mitigation bank within the same bank service area as the wetland impacted by the discharge.

AB190-ASA1,4,13 c. Except as provided in par. (ag), if credits are not available to be purchased as provided under subd. 1. b., credits may be purchased from a mitigation bank in the same basin as the wetland impacted by the discharge.

AB190-ASA1,6 Section 6 . 281.36 (3r) (a) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:

AB190-ASA1,4,16 281.36 (3r) (a) 2. Participating in the in lieu fee subprogram, if such a subprogram is established under par. (e).

AB190-ASA1,7 Section 7 . 281.36 (3r) (ag) of the statutes is created to read:

AB190-ASA1,4,24 281.36 (3r) (ag) The department may, in consultation with the U.S. army corps of engineers, allow credits to be purchased from a different mitigation bank than the one prescribed under par. (a) 1. or allow mitigation to be done through the in lieu fee subprogram rather than by purchasing credits from a mitigation bank if the department determines it would better serve natural resource goals, such as retaining flood water, improving or restoring wildlife habitat, or more closely matching the impacted wetland type.

AB190-ASA1,8 Section 8 . 281.36 (3r) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB190-ASA1,5,3 281.36 (3r) (b) Under the mitigation program, mitigation as specified in par. (a) 1. and participation in the in lieu fee subprogram, if established under par. (a) 2. shall be the preferred types of mitigation.

AB190-ASA1,9 Section 9 . 281.36 (3r) (e) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB190-ASA1,5,16 281.36 (3r) (e) As part of the mitigation program established under par. (a), the department may shall establish an in lieu fee subprogram, under which payments are made to the department or another entity for the purposes of restoring, enhancing, creating, or preserving wetlands or other water resource features. The subprogram must be approved by the U.S. army corps of engineers. The department shall establish requirements for calculating the in lieu fee payments. Under the in lieu fee subprogram, the wetlands that benefit from the subprogram shall be open to the public for hunting, fishing, trapping, cross-country skiing, or hiking or any combination thereof, but the department may establish reasonable restrictions on the use of the land by the public in order to protect public safety or to protect a unique plant or animal community. The subprogram shall be consistent with federal regulations.

AB190-ASA1,10 Section 10 . 281.36 (3t) (g) of the statutes is created to read:

AB190-ASA1,5,19 281.36 (3t) (g) Financial assurance requirements for the construction of mitigation projects by mitigation banks.

AB190-ASA1,11 Section 11 . 281.36 (3w) of the statutes is created to read:

AB190-ASA1,5,21 281.36 (3w) Release of credits. (a) In this subsection:

AB190-ASA1,5,24 1. “Applicant” means the applicant for a wetland individual permit for which wetland mitigation is required under sub. (3n) (d) or the proponent of a wetland mitigation project required under sub. (3n) (d).

AB190-ASA1,6,2 2. “Bank sponsor" means any public or private entity financially responsible for establishing or operating a mitigation bank.

AB190-ASA1,6,5 3. “Compensation site plan" means a comprehensive document prepared by an applicant or bank sponsor that provides a thorough description of a proposed wetland mitigation project.

AB190-ASA1,6,9 4. “Developing mitigation bank” means a mitigation bank that has not completed its mitigation project and that has not yet been established under an agreement between the bank sponsor and the department or otherwise approved by the department.

AB190-ASA1,6,11 5. “Estimated credits” means the total number of credits that a developing mitigation bank estimates it will have once its mitigation project is constructed.

AB190-ASA1,6,13 6. “Mitigation banking instrument” means the legal document that governs the establishment, operation, and use of a mitigation bank.

AB190-ASA1,6,17 (b) A developing mitigation bank may sell its estimated credits under the mitigation program under sub. (3r) only if the mitigation bank has met the financial assurance requirements established by the department under sub. (3t) (g) and, except as provided under par. (c), only in accordance with the following schedule:

AB190-ASA1,6,19 1. No more than 20 percent of the estimated credits after the department approves and executes the mitigation banking instrument.

AB190-ASA1,6,22 2. No more than 65 percent of the estimated credits after the department issues a letter of compliance stating that construction and all corrective actions are complete.

AB190-ASA1,6,25 3. No more than 85 percent of the estimated credits after the department approves a monitoring report for the mitigation bank or after 2 years have passed after construction of the mitigation project is completed, whichever is later.