This is the preview version of the Wisconsin State Legislature site.
Please see http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov for the production version.
STATE OF WISCONSIN
OPTOMETRY EXAMINING BOARD
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE MATTER OF RULEMAKING   :   ORDER OF THE
PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE     :   OPTOMETRY EXAMINING BOARD
OPTOMETRY EXAMINING BOARD   :   ADOPTING EMERGENCY RULES
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The statement of scope for this rule, SS 010-19, was approved by the Governor on January 3, 2019, published in Register No. 757A3 on January 14, 2019, and approved by the Optometry Examining Board on February 7, 2019. This emergency rule was approved by the Governor on February 22, 2019.
ORDER
An order of the Optometry Examining Board to amend Opt 3.02 (3), 4.03 (2) (b), and 7.05 (2) (b) 2. a., relating to the examination on the treatment and management of ocular disease.
Analysis prepared by the Department of Safety and Professional Services.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINDING OF EMERGENCY
The Optometry Examining Board finds that an emergency exists and that this rule is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or welfare. A statement of facts constituting the emergency is:
The Optometry Examining Board requires that license applicants pass Parts I, II, and III of the National Board of Examiners in Optometry (NBEO) examination. Part II of the NBEO has an embedded portion on the Treatment and Management of Ocular Disease (TMOD). The TMOD questions, “test knowledge regarding general and ocular pharmacology as it relates to optometry with particular emphasis on the use of topical ocular diagnostic pharmaceutical agents and therapeutic pharmaceutical agents, including the treatment of adverse reactions to such pharmaceutical agents, and knowledge regarding the removal of foreign bodies from an eye or from an appendage to the eye,” in accordance with s. 449.04 (2), Stats. Therapeutic pharmaceutical agents include opioids, under s. 961.39, Stats. However, the passing score of Part II is determined as an overall score, so that applicants can fail the TMOD embedded questions yet pass Part II of the examination. The Board needs to amend the administrative rules for the health, safety, and welfare of the people of Wisconsin to clarify that applicants need to pass the TMOD portion as part of Part II.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANALYSIS
Statutes interpreted: ss. 440.08 (3) (b), 449.04 (1) (c) and (2), and 449.055 (1), Stats.
Statutory authority: ss. 15.08 (5) (b), 227.11 (2) (b), 440.08 (3) (b), and 449.04 (1) (c), Stats.
Explanation of agency authority:
Section 15.08 (5) (b), Stats., states that the examining board, “shall promulgate rules for its own guidance and for the guidance of the trade or profession to which it pertains, and define and enforce professional conduct and unethical practices not inconsistent with the law relating to the particular trade or profession.”
Section 227.11 (2) (b), Stats., sets forth the parameters of an agency’s rule-making authority, stating an agency, “may prescribe forms and procedures in connection with any statute enforced or administered by it, if the agency considers it necessary to effectuate the purpose of the statute, but this paragraph does not authorize the imposition of a substantive requirement in connection with a form or procedure.”
Section 440.08 (3) (b), Stats., states that, “the interested examining board may promulgate rules requiring the holder of a credential who fails to renew the credential within 5 years after its renewal date to complete requirements in order to restore the credential …”
Section 449.04 (1) (c), Stats., requires that a, “person passes an examination approved or conducted by the examining board” in order to be granted a license. Subsection (2) states that, “[t]he examination shall test knowledge regarding general and ocular pharmacology as it relates to optometry with particular emphasis on the use of topical ocular diagnostic pharmaceutical agents and therapeutic pharmaceutical agents, including the treatment of adverse reactions to such pharmaceutical agents, and knowledge regarding the removal of foreign bodies from an eye or from an appendage to the eye,” and that “the examining board may do any of the following:
(a) Prepare, administer, and grade the examination.
(b) Approve in whole or in part an examination prepared, administered, and graded by the national board of examiners in optometry or another examination provider approved by the examining board.
(c) Approve and administer an examination prepared and graded by or under the direction of the national board of examiners in optometry or another examination provider approved by the examining board.”
Related statute or rule:
Opt 6, relating to the use of diagnostic and therapeutic pharmaceutical agents and removal of superficial foreign bodies from an eye or from an appendage to the eye
Plain language analysis:
The rules for licensure by examination, licensure by endorsement, and late renewal are amended to conform to statute, specifically to clarify that applicants need to pass the TMOD exam in order to meet the statutorily-defined minimum standards.
Summary of, and comparison with, existing or proposed federal regulation:
The federal government schedules therapeutic pharmaceutical agents through the Controlled Substances Act, which categorizes optometrists as mid-level practitioners under Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 1300.01.
Summary of public comments and feedback on the statement of scope:
The Optometry Examining Board, upon direction under s. 227.136 (1), Stats., held a preliminary public hearing and comment period on February 7, 2019 for SS 010-19. The Board received one public testifier in support of the statement of scope. After consideration of the public comments, the Board approved the statement of scope for implementation.
Comparison with rules in adjacent states:
Illinois:
Loading...
Loading...
Links to Admin. Code and Statutes in this Register are to current versions, which may not be the version that was referred to in the original published document.