The department is required to promulgate these rules under provisions of 2017 Act 21. Act 21 revises the laws relating to aquaculture and fish farms in a variety of ways. It provides a pathway for private fish farms to enter into agreements with the DNR in order to stock fish into waters of the state. The Act also specifically requires the department to promulgate rules on the role of genetics in departmental fish stocking and standardization of fish donation procedures. The Act also provides that the department must review existing rules relating to viral hemorrhagic septicemia, a fatal fish disease affecting several Wisconsin waters, and promulgate new rules to update VHS policies as needed. Additionally, the Act directs the department to evaluate the use of bait and forage fish, particularly non-native species classified under Ch. NR 40, Wis. Admin. Code, and allows the department to reclassify such species as necessary. Under the new laws, the department must continue to consult with interested parties including fishing groups and the aquaculture industry when creating these rules. The department has undertaken a thorough review of rules pertaining to viral hemorrhagic septicemia and the use of non-native bait and forage fish. While the department has determined that no additional rules are necessary at this time, several guidance documents are in the final stages of development, including best management practices for transportation of baitfish and a fish donation policy document. The department has also initiated meetings with stakeholder input to review the status of non-native mosquitofish, which may be inadvertently transported among baitfish, and reclassify mosquitofish in ch. NR 40 as needed. Additionally, the department continues to work with the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection on their rules relating to health certificate requirements for transfer of fish between Type 3 registered fish farms and to waters without confirmed presence of viral hemorrhagic septicemia. SECTION 1 defines the role and extent that genetics is involved in the department’s fish stocking strategies. The department’s current strategy for stocking fish considers genetic factors of both fish being stocked and of fish already present in a waterbody. This section also establishes that the department may establish collaborative relationships with other public and private entities for the purposes of aquaculture and stocking fish into Wisconsin waters.
SECTION 2 establishes the department’s policy on accepting donations of live fish or fish eggs. These rules will establish a timelier process for accepting donations of surplus fish or eggs from private aquaculturists.
6. Summary of, and Comparison with, Existing or Proposed Federal Statutes and Regulations:
No federal regulations apply to activities that occur entirely within the state. States possess inherent authority to manage the fishery and wildlife resources located within their boundaries, except insofar as preempted by federal treaties and laws, including regulations established in the Federal Register.
For activities involving movement of fish or eggs between the states, a violation of state law constitutes a violation of federal law under the Lacey Act. Violations would be enforceable by agents of the United States Fish & Wildlife Service.
7. Comparison with Similar Rules in Adjacent States:
Minnesota statutes allow the Department of Natural Resources to sell or barter fish fry or eggs at the cost of production and allow the department to sell fish or fish eggs from the state hatchery at fair market value to private hatcheries. In Iowa, licensed aquaculturists may only obtain fish from public waters of the state as authorized by the director of the Department of Natural Resources. Rules in Michigan and Illinois do not currently provide for the state to supply fish to private aquaculturists.
Michigan statutes specify that genetically engineered fish may not be introduced, and the Michigan Department of Natural Resources internal policy on stocking describes the guidelines for maintaining genetic integrity in stocked waters. No other neighboring states have established rules or policy relating to the role of genetics in stocking.
8. Summary of Factual Data and Analytical Methodologies Used and How Any Related Findings Support the Regulatory Approach Chosen:
The department’s handbook chapter on fish stocking explains the importance of stocking strains of fish that are genetically adapted to the local area. Central to this stocking strategy is meeting the management goals for the diverse fisheries of the state. The department’s stocking strategy ensures that a stock selected for transfer is compatible with the geographic area in which stocking occurs, and does not put unique genetic resources at risk. Because each native fish population’s genetics well suited to the environment, maintaining the genetics within these populations helps maintain population diversity across the state. Stocking with strains not suited to the local environment could reduce the genetic diversity of the local population and may contribute to outbreeding depression, in which introduced genetics result in offspring with inferior fitness.
To determine which strains are appropriate for stocking, the department creates species-specific management plans that include information on the genetic structure of populations across the landscape and spatially distinct genetic management units that encompass genetically similar populations. The department analyzes the genetic composition of wild fish populations by collecting tissue samples across a broad array of populations and comparing the polymorphic genetic markers to identify genetic differences. To arrive at a stocking plan, the department assesses genetic population structure and diversity and reproductive biology, determines broodstock collection protocols and sources that will preserve genetic diversity, and locations appropriate for stocking.
Walleye, muskellunge, and lake sturgeon are species for which genetics are significant considerations. A challenge of these policies is that private aquaculture may not have fish with genetics that the department has determined are the most appropriate for a region. New policies will make it possible to work cooperatively with private aquaculture so that they have access to genetically appropriate fish as well as to establish predictable stocking policies.
The department’s policy on receiving gifts, which would include donations of live fish or fish eggs, is described in manual codes 1401 and 1403.11 as well as a new manual code currently under development. Rules related to standardizing donations of fish will closely reflect the policy outlined in these manual codes. It is the policy of the Department of Natural Resources Board to accept gifts and bequests for the promotion of activities beneficial to the preservation, wise use and scientific management of Wisconsin’s natural resources. Significant donations are accepted at monthly meetings of the board; however, this process may not be responsive enough to utilize gifts of live fish or eggs for stocking into waters of the state. Private aquaculturists have offered surplus fish to the department in the past, but the department has been unable to take advantage of this opportunity because a clear and streamlined process for accepting such donations was not in place.
9. Analysis and Supporting Documents Used to Determine the Effect on Small Business or in Preparation of an Economic Impact Report:
According to the report “A Consumer’s Guide for Wisconsin Farm-Raised Fish,” jointly produced by the Wisconsin Aquaculture Association, University of Wisconsin-Extension, Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection and the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point Northern Aquaculture Demonstration Facility, aquaculture results in the sale of over $14 million in fish and minnows and contributes $21 million in economic activity to the state. Because these rules will provide additional flexibility to the aquaculture industry, these rules may benefit private aquaculturists, which could in turn increase the industry’s contribution to the state’s economy.
10. Effect on Small Business (initial regulatory flexibility analysis):
These rules may create additional opportunities for businesses in the aquaculture industry, which may generate beneficial economic impacts. For example, aquaculturists may gain access to unique wild genetics through cooperative agreements with the department, and public and private partnerships to produce fish may be created. The department has met with the representatives of the aquaculture industry and state-licensed commercial fishing representatives and has held public meetings to consider policies and regulations relating to these rules.
The rules will not have an economic impact on recreational angling, though recreational anglers may indirectly benefit from new partnerships for stocking fish into waters of the state.
The rule will not impose new compliance or reporting requirements or design or operational standards.
The department will develop a preliminary economic impact analysis and hold a comment period pursuant to Governor’s Executive Order 50, Section IV, in winter 2018. Fiscal impacts on the department will also be summarized in this analysis.
12. Place where comments are to be submitted and deadline for submission:
Written comments may be submitted at the public hearings, by regular mail, fax or email to:
Meredith Penthorn
Department of Natural Resources
P.O Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707
608-316-0080
Hearing dates and the comment submission deadline are to be determined.
Section 1 NR 1.02 (4) (a), (b) and (c) are created to read:
1.02 (4) (a) The department shall establish clear policies related to stocking in order to protect the genetic integrity of native fish populations and nonnative, self-sustained populations of fish of the species defined in s. NR 40.02 (30) within the state. (b) Preserving the genetic integrity of fish population is a central goal of fisheries management in Wisconsin. All fish stocking in Wisconsin inland waters shall be conducted so that natural genetic boundaries are maintained. Stocking shall be considered an important restoration tool used to reestablish naturally reproducing populations and may not be conducted to the potential detriment of natural reproduction.
(c) In order to effectively meet statewide goals, the department may develop collaborative relationships with other private and public entities that stock fish into waterbodies of the state. These relationships may include provisions for the state to provide surplus fish or fish eggs to these entities to ensure that fish being stocked into waters of the state meet statewide genetics management goals.
Section 2 NR 1.985 is created to read:
1.985 Donation of live fish or fish eggs from a private fish farm. Pursuant to the policies established in s. NR 1.02, the department may accept gifts of live fish or fish eggs from a private fish farm located within Wisconsin if: (1) The fish or fish eggs will be stocked into waters of the state accessible to the public for which stocking needs have not been met.
(2) The fish or fish eggs of the species to be stocked are of a compatible genetic strain to the native population of that species in the waters to be stocked.
(3) The fish or fish eggs are covered under a valid fish health certificate issued under s. ATCP 10.65. Section 3. Effective Date. This rule takes effect upon publication in the Wisconsin Administrative Register as provided in s. 227.22 (2) (intro.), Stats. Section 4. Board adoption. This rule was approved and adopted by the State of Wisconsin Natural Resources Board on [DATE].
