This is the preview version of the Wisconsin State Legislature site.
Please see http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov for the production version.
LRB-5206/1
KMS&JPC:cdc
2023 - 2024 LEGISLATURE
December 8, 2023 - Introduced by Senators Wimberger and Knodl, cosponsored
by Representatives Tusler and O'Connor. Referred to Committee on
Judiciary and Public Safety.
SB759,2,22 1An Act to repeal 701.0110 (1) (a), (b) and (c), 701.0405 (1) and 701.0418; to
2renumber
701.0304, 701.0305 (1), 701.0305 (2), 701.0305 (3), 701.0602 (3) (b)
31., 701.0602 (3) (b) 2. and 701.0802 (5); to renumber and amend 701.0103
4(24), 701.0110 (1) (intro.), 701.0302, 711.04 (1) and 766.58 (13) (b); to
5consolidate, renumber and amend
701.0602 (3) (intro.), (a) and (b) (intro.);
6to amend 30.541 (3) (d) 1. a., 101.9211 (4) (a) 1., 342.17 (4) (a) 1., 700.16 (1) (c),
7700.27 (1) (d), 701.0103 (4), 701.0103 (9), 701.0103 (18), 701.0103 (21) (intro.),
8701.0103 (23), 701.0103 (27), 701.0103 (30), 701.0109 (title), 701.0109 (3),
9701.0110 (2), 701.0110 (3), 701.0111 (4), 701.0111 (5) (d), 701.0111 (6), 701.0203
10(1), 701.0302 (title), 701.0303 (4), 701.0303 (5), 701.0303 (6) (intro.), 701.0303
11(6) (a), 701.0303 (6) (b), 701.0303 (6) (c), 701.0303 (6) (d), 701.0402 (1) (e),
12701.0408, 701.0410 (2), 701.0410 (3), 701.0411 (1), 701.0411 (2) (a), 701.0411 (2)
13(b), 701.0411 (7), 701.0414 (4), 701.0415, 701.0416, 701.0505 (1) (a) 2., 701.0505
14(2) (e) 3., 701.0602 (1), 701.0602 (4), 701.0702 (3), 701.0706 (2) (c), 701.0706 (2)

1(d), 701.0707 (2), 701.0813 (1), (2) (d) and (3) (a) (intro.), 701.0813 (2) (a),
2701.0813 (3) (b), 701.0813 (5), 701.0817 (3) (b), 701.1005 (1), 701.1005 (2),
3701.1009 (2), 701.1105 (1) (b), 701.1136 (1), 711.04 (2), 711.05 (2) (b), 711.06 (2)
4(intro.), 711.06 (2) (b), 711.07 (3) (b), 711.13, 766.01 (9) (a), 766.31 (7) (b), 766.58
5(13) (c), 766.59 (1), 766.63 (1), 851.21 (2) (e), 854.13 (1) (c), 856.29, 859.02 (3) and
6865.08 (6); to repeal and recreate 701.0103 (21) (a) and (b), 701.0508,
7701.0818 (2) (b) 2. h. and chapter 702; and to create 701.0102 (12m), 701.0103
8(1m), 701.0103 (1n), 701.0103 (3) (c), 701.0103 (3m), 701.0103 (3r), 701.0103
9(3u), 701.0103 (3x), 701.0103 (5g), 701.0103 (5w), 701.0103 (11p), 701.0103
10(15m), 701.0103 (19m), 701.0103 (19r), 701.0103 (19v), 701.0103 (21m),
11701.0103 (23m), 701.0109 (5), 701.0111 (5) (m), 701.0111 (7), 701.0113, 701.0201
12(3) (km), 701.0201 (4), 701.0302 (1), 701.0303 (6) (e), 701.0304 (2), 701.0306,
13701.0307 (title), 701.0308, 701.0401 (5m), 701.0411 (1m), 701.0411 (2) (intro.),
14701.0509, 701.0605, 701.0704 (1) (g), 701.0802 (5) (b), 701.0802 (9), 701.0813 (3)
15(c), 701.0813 (6) and (7), 701.0815 (3), 701.0816 (29), 701.0816 (30), subchapter
16XIII of chapter 701 [precedes 701.1301], 711.03 (4m), 711.04 (1) (b), 711.04 (1)
17(c), 711.04 (1) (d), 766.01 (9) (e), 766.01 (9) (f), 766.31 (7) (g), 766.58 (7) (c), 766.58
18(13) (b) 2. and 3., 766.625, 766.70 (3) (dm), 814.66 (1) (o) and 905.03 (2m) of the
19statutes; relating to: trust administration, the Uniform Powers of
20Appointment Act, the Uniform Trust Decanting Act, disclosure of certain
21digital property, and the classification of certain digital property as individual
22property for purposes of determining marital property.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes several changes to the administration of trusts, the power to
decant trusts, the creation and exercise of powers of appointment, the disclosure of

certain digital property, and the classification of digital property as individual
property for purposes of determining marital property. Important provisions of the
bill are summarized as follows:
Administration of trusts
The bill makes several technical changes to the administration and regulation
of trusts in the state, including the following:
1. The bill provides that notice given to any trustee when more than one person
is serving as trustee is considered to be given to all persons serving as trustee, except
that notice must be given to all corporations and attorneys that are serving as
trustee.
2. The bill expands the concept of representation in a trust proceeding. Under
the bill, a person holding a general power of appointment or a broad limited power
of appointment may represent and bind the interests of all persons whose interests
may be eliminated, regardless of whether there is a conflict of interest. A person
holding a nongeneral power of appointment may represent and bind the interests of
any person whose interest may be limited by the exercise of the power, provided there
is no conflict of interest. A presumptive remainder beneficiary may represent and
bind the interests of a contingent successor remainder beneficiary or a more remote
contingent successor beneficiary, regardless of whether the beneficiary lacks
capacity and provided there is no conflict of interest. If a presumptive remainder
beneficiary does not represent a more remote contingent successor remainder
beneficiary, a contingent successor remainder beneficiary may represent and bind a
more remote contingent successor remainder beneficiary. The bill also confirms that
a settlor can nominate in the trust instrument a designated representative to
represent and bind any beneficiary.
3. The bill allows for the creation of a trust without initially funding the trust.
To create such a trust, the bill requires a person to declare the intention to create a
trust with the intention that the trust will be funded by assets of the person who
created the trust or by another person with legal authority to fund the trust. Under
the bill, the person making the declaration is considered to have created the trust
regardless of whether the person funds the trust with the person's own assets.
4. The bill provides for the resolution of debts against a deceased settlor of a
trust that was revocable until the settlor's death. First, the bill provides that a
claimant must assert a claim for payment of a debt of a deceased settlor within any
applicable deadline established by law. A trustee of a trust that was revocable at the
settlor's death may shorten the time period and set a deadline for filing claims with
the trustee by publishing a legal notice or giving notice to a potential claimant. A
claim that was barred by a statute of limitations at the time of the deceased settlor's
death is barred and the claimant may not pursue a claim against the trustee, the
trust property, or recipients with respect to trust property. However, a claim not
barred by a statute of limitations at the time of the settlor's death is not barred
thereafter by a statute of limitations if the claim is filed by the deadline for filing a
claim after the death of the settlor. The deadlines established for filing a claim after
the death of the settlor do not extend the time for commencement of a claim beyond
the time provided by any statute of limitations applicable to that claim. Failure of

a claimant to file a claim within applicable deadlines does not bar the claimant from
satisfying the claim, if not otherwise barred, from property other than trust property.
5. The bill further provides for the form and verification of claims against a
deceased settlor, the trustee response to claims against a deceased settlor, contest
and enforcement of claims against a deceased settlor, compromise of claims against
a deceased settlor, payment of claims against a deceased settlor, and the priority of
claims against a deceased settlor.
6. The bill provides that a trustee of a trust has an insurable interest in the life
of an insured under a life insurance policy that is owned by the trustee of the trust
acting in a fiduciary capacity or that designates the trust itself as the owner if, on
the date the policy is issued, the insured is a settlor of the trust or is an individual
in whom a settlor of the trust has, or would have if living at the time the life insurance
policy was issued, an insurable interest in the life of the insured and the life
insurance proceeds are primarily for the benefit of one or more trust beneficiaries
who either have an insurable interest in the life of the insured or have a substantial
interest engendered by love or affection in the continuation of the life of the insured
and, if the beneficiary does not have an insurable interest in the life of the insured,
are related to the insured as provided in the bill.
Uniform Trust Decanting Act
Current law allows a trustee to transfer the assets of a trust to a second trust
subject to certain requirements. The bill adopts the Uniform Trust Decanting Act
(UTDA). The UTDA, as adopted, replaces the current language governing the
transfer of assets to a second trust and makes several substantive changes to current
law.
The bill defines “decanting power” as the power to 1) modify the terms of a trust
or 2) distribute the property of a trust to a second trust. Under the bill, an authorized
fiduciary may exercise the decanting power. An “authorized fiduciary” is defined as
1) a trustee or another fiduciary, other than the settlor, that has discretion to
distribute or direct a trustee to distribute principal from a trust to a beneficiary; 2)
a special fiduciary appointed by a court to exercise the decanting power; 3) a trustee
or fiduciary that has the discretion or obligation to distribute property to
beneficiaries of a trust that has a beneficiary with a disability; or 4) a trust protector
who has been granted the decanting power.
The decanting power under this bill applies only to a trust that 1) is irrevocable
or revocable by the settlor only with the consent of the trustee or a person that has
an adverse interest in the revocation of the trust and 2) is not held solely for
charitable purposes. The bill specifies that a first-trust instrument is deemed to
include the decanting power unless the first-trust instrument explicitly prohibits or
restricts exercise of the decanting power. The UTDA provisions of the bill apply to
any trust created before, on, or after the effective date of the bill if the trust is
governed or administered under the law of this state.
Under current law, a trustee may only transfer assets to a second trust with
court approval or through a notice procedure. The current notice procedure requires
giving notice to the settlor, beneficiaries, and certain powerholders of a trust 30 days
prior to transferring assets from that first trust to a second trust. The bill requires

a similar 30-day notice for exercise of the decanting power, but requires notice to be
provided to additional powerholders and fiduciaries of the first trust as well as
powerholders and fiduciaries of the second trust and, for certain trusts with a
charitable interest, the attorney general. Under the bill, an exercise of the decanting
power is effective if the authorized fiduciary acted with reasonable care to comply
with the notice requirement, even if the fiduciary failed to provide notice to every
person entitled to notice.
In addition, under current law, a trustee may not appoint assets to a second
trust if a contribution to the first trust qualified for a marital or charitable deduction
for federal income, gift, or estate tax purposes and the second trust would prevent
the asset from qualifying for the deduction or reduce the amount of the deduction.
The bill retains this prohibition and expands it to other tax benefits, including
deductions for state income, gift, estate, and inheritance taxes and any tax benefit
for which a first trust is clearly designed to qualify. The bill also prohibits the use
of the decanting power to 1) increase an authorized fiduciary's compensation, 2)
relieve an authorized fiduciary from liability for breach of trust in a second-trust
instrument to a greater extent than in the first-trust instrument, or 3) reduce the
aggregate fiduciary liability of all fiduciaries of a second trust without court approval
or the consent of all of the qualified beneficiaries of a second trust.
The bill includes additional provisions about the decanting power for certain
types of trusts. Specifically, in a trust that has a beneficiary with a disability, an
authorized fiduciary may exercise the decanting power if the second trust is a special
needs trust that benefits the beneficiary with a disability and the authorized
fiduciary determines that exercise of the decanting power will further the purposes
of the first trust. Under the bill, a “special needs trust” means a trust that the trustee
believes would not be considered a resource for purposes of determining whether a
beneficiary with a disability is eligible for governmental benefits based on disability.
Also, if a first trust contains a charitable interest, a second trust may not diminish
the charitable interest, diminish the interest of an identified charitable organization
that holds the charitable interest, alter any charitable purpose stated in the
first-trust instrument, or alter any condition or restriction related to the charitable
interest. In addition, the bill specifies that the decanting power may be exercised
over an animal trust. An “animal trust” is defined under the bill as a trust created
to provide for the care of an animal that has a person appointed to enforce the trust
on behalf of the animal. If a first trust is an animal trust, a second trust must provide
that trust property may be applied only to its intended purpose for the period the first
trust benefitted the animal.
If the trust instrument for a second trust does not comply with all of the
requirements of the UTDA but the exercise of the decanting power would otherwise
be effective, then 1) any provision that is included in the second-trust instrument
in violation of the UTDA is void and 2) any provision omitted from the second-trust
instrument in violation of the UTDA is deemed to be included in the second-trust
instrument.

Uniform Powers of Appointment Act
The bill adopts the Uniform Powers of Appointment Act. Under the bill, a
“power of appointment” means a power that enables a powerholder acting in a
nonfiduciary capacity to designate a recipient of an ownership interest in or another
power of appointment over the appointive property. A power of appointment is
created only if the instrument creating the power governs the disposition of the
appointive property and the terms of the instrument manifest the donor's intention
to create in a powerholder a power of appointment over the appointive property
exercisable in favor of a permissible appointee. Under the bill, unless the terms of
the instrument creating the power of appointment state otherwise, a power of
appointment is presumed to be a presently exercisable power of appointment, an
exclusionary power of appointment, and a general power of appointment. An
“exclusionary power of appointment” means a power of appointment exercisable in
favor of one or more permissible appointees to the exclusion of the other permissible
appointees. A “general power of appointment” means a power of appointment
exercisable in favor of the powerholder, the powerholder's estate, a creditor of the
powerholder, or a creditor of the powerholder's estate. The bill provides, however,
that a power of appointment is presumed to be a nongeneral power of appointment
if the power is exercisable only at the powerholder's death and the permissible
appointees of the power are a defined and limited class that does not include the
powerholder's estate, the powerholder's creditors, or the creditors of the
powerholder's estate.
Under the bill, a power of appointment is exercised only if the instrument
exercising the power is valid under law, the terms of the instrument manifest the
powerholder's intent to exercise the power, and the instrument satisfies any
requirements of exercise imposed by the donor, if any. If a power of appointment is
vested in two or more persons, then the powerholders may only exercise the power
of appointment unanimously. Under the bill, a powerholder may exercise their
power of appointment by including a residuary clause in the powerholder's will, or
a comparable clause in the powerholder's revocable trust, if the will or trust
instrument manifests intent to do so, the power of appointment is a general power
of appointment, there is no gift-in-default clause in the instrument creating the
power of appointment, and the powerholder did not previously release the power of
appointment.
If the powerholder releases or fails to exercise a general power of appointment,
the bill provides that the gift-in-default clause controls the unappointed property
or, if there is no gift-in-default clause, the bill provides default rules for how the
unappointed property is disposed. A personal representative, trustee, or other
fiduciary who holds property subject to a power of appointment may administer the
appointive property as if the power of appointment was not exercised if the personal
representative, trustee, or other fiduciary has no notice of the existence of any
documentation of the powerholder purporting to exercise the power of appointment
by will or otherwise within six months after the death of the powerholder.

Classification of digital property as individual property
The bill establishes an exception to Wisconsin's general marital property law,
allowing digital property to be classified as individual property if the property meets
certain criteria. Under the bill, an account and the digital property held in an
account, including the content of electronic communications such as personal email,
that is created and maintained for personal use is classified as individual property,
unless either the account or the digital property in the account was not originally
created, purchased, or otherwise acquired exclusively for the personal, noneconomic
purposes of the account holder, or the account or the digital property in the account
has at any time been used for purposes other than the personal, noneconomic
purposes of the spouse holding the account. Under the bill, in the event of a sale,
exchange, or other disposition, all property received in exchange for that account, or
the digital property in the account, is classified as marital property; and, further,
income during marriage and after the determination date attributable to the
account, or the digital property in the account, is classified as marital property.
Disclosure of digital property
Under current law, a user may use an online tool to direct a custodian of digital
property to disclose or not to disclose to a designated recipient some or all of the user's
digital property in certain circumstances. If an online tool allows the user to modify
or delete a direction at all times, a direction regarding disclosure using an online tool
overrides a contrary direction by the user in a will, trust, power of attorney, or any
other governing instrument. If a user has not used an online tool or if the custodian
has not provided an online tool, the user may allow or prohibit disclosure to a
fiduciary of some or all of the user's digital property, including the content of
electronic communications sent or received by the user, in a will, trust, power of
attorney, or any other governing instrument.
The bill provides that a user may allow or prohibit the disclosure to a fiduciary
of some or all of the user's digital property in a consent instrument. A consent
instrument is defined as a written notarized document in physical or electronic form
evidencing the user's consent to the disclosure of the contents of electronic
communications to a then acting fiduciary. However, a direction regarding
disclosure using an online tool overrides a contrary direction by the user in a consent
instrument in the same way that an online tool overrides a will, trust, power of
attorney, or other governing instrument under current law.
For further information see the state fiscal estimate, which will be printed as
an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
SB759,1 1Section 1 . 30.541 (3) (d) 1. a. of the statutes is amended to read:
SB759,8,5
130.541 (3) (d) 1. a. Evidence satisfactory to the department of the appointment
2of a trustee in bankruptcy, of a certification of trust under s. 701.1013 or the
3appointment of a trustee,
or of the issuance of domiciliary letters testamentary or
4other letters authorizing the administration of a decedent's estate, letters of
5guardianship, conservatorship, special administration, or letters of trust.
SB759,2 6Section 2 . 101.9211 (4) (a) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:
SB759,8,117 101.9211 (4) (a) 1. Evidence satisfactory to the department of the appointment
8of a trustee in bankruptcy, of a certification of trust under s. 701.1013 or the
9appointment of a trustee,
or of the issuance of domiciliary letters testamentary or
10other letters authorizing the administration of a decedent's estate, letters of
11guardianship, conservatorship, special administration, or letters of trust.
SB759,3 12Section 3 . 342.17 (4) (a) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:
SB759,8,1913 342.17 (4) (a) 1. Evidence satisfactory to the department of the issuance of the
14letters testamentary or other letters authorizing the administration of an estate
,
15letters of guardianship, or letters of trust,
appointment of a trustee in bankruptcy,
16of a certification of trust under s. 701.1013 or the appointment of a testamentary
17trustee,
or of the appointment of the trustee in bankruptcy issuance of domiciliary
18letters or other letters authorizing the administration of a decedent's estate,
19guardianship, conservatorship, special administration, or trust
;
SB759,4 20Section 4 . 700.16 (1) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB759,9,421 700.16 (1) (c) If a future interest or trust is created by exercise of a power of
22appointment, the permissible period is computed from the time the power of
23appointment is exercised if the power of appointment is a general power of
24appointment, as defined in s. 702.02 (5) 702.102 (7), even if the general power of
25appointment is exercisable only by will. In the case of other powers of appointment

1the permissible period is computed from the time the power of appointment is created
2but facts at the time the power of appointment is exercised are considered in
3determining whether the power of alienation is suspended beyond a life or lives in
4being at the time of creation of the power of appointment plus 30 years.
SB759,5 5Section 5 . 700.27 (1) (d) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB759,9,76 700.27 (1) (d) “Power of appointment" has the meaning given in s. 702.02 (6)
7702.102 (14).
SB759,6 8Section 6 . 701.0102 (12m) of the statutes is created to read:
SB759,9,109 701.0102 (12m) An account that is part of a qualified ABLE program under
10section 529A (b) of the Internal Revenue Code.
SB759,7 11Section 7 . 701.0103 (1m) of the statutes is created to read:
SB759,9,1412 701.0103 (1m) “Animal protector” means a person appointed in an animal trust
13to enforce the trust on behalf of the animal or, if no such person is appointed in the
14trust, a person appointed by the court for that purpose.
Loading...
Loading...