This is the preview version of the Wisconsin State Legislature site.
Please see http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov for the production version.
LRB-3972/1
MIM:amn
2023 - 2024 LEGISLATURE
January 4, 2024 - Introduced by Representatives J. Anderson, C. Anderson, Bare,
Emerson, Madison and Sinicki, cosponsored by Senator L. Johnson. Referred
to Committee on Labor and Integrated Employment.
AB903,1,3 1An Act to renumber and amend 103.465; to amend 103.465 (title); and to
2create
103.465 (2) and (3) of the statutes; relating to: prohibitions on
3nondisparagement clauses in employment contracts.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a covenant by an employee or agent not to compete with his
or her employer or principal during the term of the employment or agency, or after
the termination of that employment or agency, within a specified territory and
during a specified time (covenant not to compete) is lawful and enforceable if the
restrictions imposed are reasonably necessary for the protection of the employer or
principal. Currently, any covenant not to compete that imposes an unreasonable
restraint on an employee or agent is illegal, void, and unenforceable even as to any
part of the covenant that would be a reasonable restraint.
This bill provides that a provision in an employment contract that prohibits an
employee or agent from disparaging an employer or principal after the termination
of the employment or agency is illegal, void, and unenforceable.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
AB903,1 4Section 1. 103.465 (title) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB903,2,2
1103.465 (title) Restrictive covenants in employment contracts;
2prohibitions.
AB903,2 3Section 2. 103.465 of the statutes is renumbered 103.465 (1) and amended to
4read:
AB903,2,135 103.465 (1) Covenants in employment contracts not to compete. A covenant
6by an assistant, servant, employee, or agent not to compete with his or her employer
7or principal during the term of the employment or agency, or after the termination
8of that employment or agency, within a specified territory and during a specified time
9is lawful and enforceable only if the restrictions imposed are reasonably necessary
10for the protection of the employer or principal. Any covenant, described in this
11section, imposing subsection, that imposes an unreasonable restraint on trade is
12illegal, void, and unenforceable even as to any part of the covenant or performance
13that would be a reasonable restraint on trade.
AB903,3 14Section 3. 103.465 (2) and (3) of the statutes are created to read:
AB903,2,2015 103.465 (2) Nondisparagement provisions in employment contract after
16termination of employment or agency prohibited.
A provision in an employment
17contract that requires an assistant, servant, employee, or agent not to disparage his
18or her former employer or former principal in writing or in speech after the
19termination of the employment or agency imposes an unreasonable restraint on
20trade and is illegal, void, and unenforceable.
AB903,3,3 21(3) Notice posted. Each employer and principal shall post, in one or more
22conspicuous places where notices to assistants, servants, employees, and agents are
23customarily posted, and in a conspicuous place on the employer's or principal's
24website if the employer or principal maintains a website, a notice in a form approved
25by the department that explains that an employment contract provision that

1prohibits a former employee or agent from disparaging the employer or principal
2after termination of employment or agency is an unreasonable restraint on trade and
3is illegal, void, and unenforceable.
AB903,4 4Section 4. Initial applicability.
AB903,3,75 (1) Nondisparagement provision in employment contracts. This act first
6applies to a nondisparagement provision in an employment contract that is entered
7into, extended, modified, or renewed on the effective date of this subsection.
AB903,3,88 (End)
Loading...
Loading...