He is the total mass of organic HAP emissions before add-on controls from all the coatings, thinners and cleaning materials used during the compliance period, kg, determined according to par. (d)
HC,i is the total mass of organic HAP emissions reduction for controlled coating operation, i, during the compliance period, kg, from Equation 1 in par. (f)
HCSR,j is the total mass of organic HAP emissions reduction for controlled coating operation, j, during the compliance period, kg, from Equation 3 in par. (g)
V
st is the total volume of coating solids used during the compliance period, liters, from Equation 2 in
s. NR 465.27 (2) (f)
q is the number of controlled coating operations except those controlled with a solvent recovery system
r is the number of coating operations controlled with a solvent recovery system
NR 465.28(2)(j)
(j) Demonstrate initial compliance with the emission limit, by ensuring that the organic HAP emission rate calculated using Equation 4 in
par. (i), is less than or equal to the applicable emission limit in
s. NR 465.25 (3). Keep all records as required by
s. NR 465.25 (3) and
(4). As part of the notification of compliance status required by
s. NR 465.25 (1), identify the coating operation or operations for which you used the emission rate with add-on controls option and submit a statement that the coating operation or operations was or were in compliance with the emission limitations during the initial compliance period because the organic HAP emission rate was less than or equal to the applicable emission limit in
s. NR 465.23 (1), and you achieved the operating limits and the work practice standards required by
s. NR 465.23 (3) and
(4) respectively.
NR 465.28(4)
(4) How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission limitations?. NR 465.28(4)(a)(a) To demonstrate continuous compliance with the applicable emission limit in
s. NR 465.23 (1), the organic HAP emission rate for each compliance period determined according to the procedures in
sub. (2) shall be equal to or less than the applicable emission limit in
s. NR 465.23 (1). Each month following the initial compliance period described in
sub. (1) is a compliance period.
NR 465.28(4)(b)
(b) If the organic HAP emission rate for any compliance period exceeded the applicable emission limit in
s. NR 465.23 (1), this is a deviation from the emission limitation for that compliance period and shall be reported as specified in
s. NR 465.25 (1) (b) 6. and
(2) (g).
NR 465.28(4)(c)
(c) You shall demonstrate continuous compliance with each operating limit required by
s. NR 465.23 (3) that applies to you as specified in Table 1 of this subchapter, and shall do the following as applicable:
NR 465.28(4)(c)2.
2. If an operating parameter deviates from the operating limit specified in Table 1 of this subchapter, assume that the emission capture system and add-on control device were achieving zero efficiency during the time period of the deviation. For the purposes of completing the compliance calculations specified in
sub. (2), treat the materials used during a deviation on a controlled coating operation as if they were used on an uncontrolled coating operation for the time period of the deviation. You may not include those materials in the calculation of organic HAP emissions reductions in Equation 1 in
sub. (2) (f).
NR 465.28(4)(d)
(d) You shall meet the requirements for bypass lines in
sub. (9) (b). You shall report it as a deviation, as specified in
s. NR 465.25 (1) (b) 6. and
(2) (g), if any bypass line is opened and emissions are diverted to the atmosphere when the coating operation is running. For the purposes of completing the compliance calculations specified in
sub. (2), you shall treat the materials used during a deviation on a controlled coating operation as if they were used on an uncontrolled coating operation for the time period of the deviation. You may not include those materials in the calculation of organic HAP emissions reductions in Equation 1 in
sub. (2) (f).
NR 465.28(4)(e)
(e) You shall demonstrate continuous compliance with the work practice standards in
s. NR 465.23 (4). You shall report it as a deviation from the work practice standards, as specified in
s. NR 465.25 (1) (b) 6. and
(2) (g), if you did not develop a work practice plan, did not implement the plan, or you did not keep the records required by
s. NR 465.25 (3) (k) 9.
NR 465.28(4)(f)
(f) As part of each semiannual compliance report required in
s. NR 465.25 (2), you shall submit a statement that you were in compliance with the emission limitations during the reporting period because the organic HAP emission rate for each compliance period was less than or equal to the applicable emission limit in
s. NR 465.23 (1), and you achieved the operating limits and the work practice standards required by
s. NR 465.23 (3) and
(4), respectively, during each compliance period.
NR 465.28(4)(g)
(g) During periods of startup, shutdown and malfunction of the emission capture system, add-on control device or coating operation that may affect emission capture or control device efficiency, you shall operate in accordance with the SSMP required by
s. NR 465.24 (1) (d).
NR 465.28(4)(h)
(h) Consistent with
ss. NR 460.05 (4) and
460.06 (4) (a), deviations that occur during a period of startup, shutdown or malfunction of the emission capture system, add-on control device or coating operation that may affect emission capture or control device efficiency are not violations if you demonstrate to the department's satisfaction that you were operating in accordance with the SSMP. The department will determine whether deviations that occur during a period of startup, shutdown or malfunction are violations according to the provisions in
s. NR 460.05 (4).
NR 465.28(5)
(5) What are the general requirements for performance tests?. NR 465.28(5)(a)(a) You shall conduct each performance test required by
sub. (1) according to the requirements in
s. NR 460.06 (4) (a) and under the following conditions unless you obtain a waiver of the performance test according to the provisions in
s. NR 460.06 (7):
NR 465.28(5)(a)1.
1. Representative operating conditions for the coating operation. Operations during periods of startup, shutdown or malfunction and periods of nonoperation do not constitute representative conditions. You shall record the process information that is necessary to document operating conditions during the test and explain why the conditions represent normal operation.
NR 465.28(5)(a)2.
2. When the emission capture system and add-on control device are operating at a representative flow rate, and the add-on control device is operating at a representative inlet concentration. You shall record information that is necessary to document emission capture system and add-on control device operating conditions during the test and explain why the conditions represent normal operation.
NR 465.28(5)(b)
(b) You shall conduct each performance test of an emission capture system according to the requirements in
sub. (6) and of an add-on control device according to the requirements in
sub. (7).
NR 465.28(5)(c)
(c) The performance test to determine add-on control device organic HAP destruction or removal efficiency shall consist of 3 runs as specified in
s. NR 460.06 (4) (c) and each run shall last at least one hour.
NR 465.28(6)
(6) How do I determine the emission capture system efficiency?. You shall use the following procedures and test methods to determine capture efficiency as part of the performance test required by
sub. (1):
NR 465.28(6)(a)
(a) You may assume the capture system efficiency is 100% if both of the following conditions are met:
NR 465.28(6)(a)1.
1. The capture system meets the criteria of Method 204 in
40 CFR part 51, Appendix M, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04 (9), for a PTE and directs all the exhaust gases from the enclosure to an add-on control device.
NR 465.28(6)(a)2.
2. All coatings, thinners and cleaning materials used in the coating operation are applied within the capture system; coating solvent flash-off and coating, curing and drying occurs within the capture system; and the removal or evaporation of cleaning materials from the surfaces they are applied to occurs within the capture system. For example, this criterion is not met if parts enter the open shop environment when being moved between a spray booth and a curing oven.
NR 465.28(6)(b)
(b) If the capture system does not meet both of the criteria in
par. (a), use one of the 3 protocols described in
subds. 1. to
3. to measure capture efficiency. The capture efficiency measurements use TVH capture efficiency as a surrogate for organic HAP capture efficiency. For the protocols in
subds. 1. and
2., the capture efficiency measurement shall consist of 3 test runs. Each test run shall be at least 3 hours duration or the length of a production run, whichever is longer, up to 8 hours. For the purposes of this test, a production run means the time required for a single part to go from the beginning to the end of production which includes surface preparation activities and drying or curing time. The protocols are as follows:
NR 465.28(6)(b)1.
1. `Liquid-to-uncaptured-gas protocol using a temporary total enclosure or building enclosure.' The liquid-to-uncaptured-gas protocol compares the mass of liquid TVH in materials used in the coating operation to the mass of TVH emissions not captured by the emission capture system. You shall use the following procedures to measure emission capture system efficiency using the liquid-to-uncaptured-gas protocol:
NR 465.28(6)(b)1.a.
a. Either use a building enclosure or construct an enclosure around the coating operation where coatings, thinners and cleaning materials are applied, and all areas where emissions from these applied coatings and materials subsequently occur, such as flash-off, curing and drying areas. The areas of the coating operation where capture devices collect emissions for routing to an add-on control device, such as the entrance and exit areas of an oven or spray booth, shall also be inside the enclosure. The enclosure shall meet the applicable definition of a temporary total enclosure or building enclosure in Method 204 in
40 CFR part 51, Appendix M, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04 (9).
NR 465.28(6)(b)1.b.
b. Use Method 204A or 204F in
40 CFR part 51, Appendix M, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04 (9), to determine the mass fraction of TVH liquid input from each coating, thinner and cleaning material used in the coating operation during each capture efficiency test run. To make the determination, substitute TVH for each occurrence of the term VOC in the methods.
NR 465.28(6)(b)1.c.
c. Use the following equation to calculate the total mass of TVH liquid input from all the coatings, thinners and cleaning materials used in the coating operation during each capture efficiency test run:
(Equation 5)
where:
TVHused is the total mass of TVH liquid input from all coatings, thinners and cleaning materials used in the coating operation during the capture efficiency test run, kg
TVHi is the mass fraction of TVH in coating, thinner or cleaning material, i, that is used in the coating operation during the capture efficiency test run, kg TVH per kg material
Voli is the total volume of coating, thinner or cleaning material, i, used in the coating operation during the capture efficiency test run, liters
Di is the density of coating, thinner or cleaning material, i, kg material per liter material
n is the number of different coatings, thinners and cleaning materials used in the coating operation during the capture efficiency test run
NR 465.28(6)(b)1.d.
d. Use Method 204D or 204E in
40 CFR part 51, Appendix M, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04 (9), to measure the total mass, kg, of TVH emissions that are not captured by the emission capture system; they are measured as they exit the temporary total enclosure or building enclosure during each capture efficiency test run. To make the measurement substitute TVH for each occurrence of the term VOC in the methods. Use Method 204D if the enclosure is a temporary total enclosure. Use Method 204E if the enclosure is a building enclosure. During the capture efficiency measurement, all organic compound emitting operations inside a building enclosure, other than the coating operation for which capture efficiency is being determined, shall be shut down, but all fans and blowers shall be operating normally.
NR 465.28(6)(b)1.e.
e. For each capture efficiency test run, determine the percent capture efficiency of the emission capture system, using the following equation:
(Equation 6)
where:
CE is the capture efficiency of the emission capture system vented to the add-on control device, percent
TVHused is the total mass of TVH liquid input used in the coating operation during the capture efficiency test run, kg
TVHuncaptured is the total mass of TVH that is not captured by the emission capture system and that exits from the temporary total enclosure or building enclosure during the capture efficiency test run, kg
NR 465.28(6)(b)1.f.
f. Determine the capture efficiency of the emission capture system as the average of the capture efficiencies measured in the 3 test runs.
NR 465.28(6)(b)2.
2. `Gas-to-gas protocol using a temporary total enclosure or a building enclosure.' The gas-to-gas protocol compares the mass of TVH emissions captured by the emission capture system to the mass of TVH emissions not captured. You shall use the following procedures to measure emission capture system efficiency using the gas-to-gas protocol.
NR 465.28(6)(b)2.a.
a. Either use a building enclosure or construct an enclosure around the coating operation where coatings, thinners and cleaning materials are applied and all areas where emissions from these applied coatings and materials subsequently occur such as flash-off, curing and drying areas. The areas of the coating operation where capture devices collect emissions generated by the coating operation for routing to an add-on control device, such as the entrance and exit areas of an oven or a spray booth, shall also be inside the enclosure. The enclosure shall meet the applicable definition of a temporary total enclosure or building enclosure in Method 204 in
40 CFR part 51, Appendix M, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04 (9).
NR 465.28(6)(b)2.b.
b. Use Method 204B or 204C in
40 CFR part 51, Appendix M, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04 (9), to measure the total mass, kg, of TVH emissions captured by the emission capture system during each capture efficiency test run as measured at the inlet to the add-on control device. To make the measurement, substitute TVH for each occurrence of the term VOC in the methods. The sampling points for the Method 204B or 204C measurement shall be upstream from the add-on control device and shall represent total emissions routed from the capture system and entering the add-on control device. If multiple emission streams from the capture system enter the add-on control device without a single common duct, the emissions entering the add-on control device shall be simultaneously measured in each duct, and the total emissions entering the add-on control device shall be determined.
NR 465.28(6)(b)2.c.
c. Use Method 204D or 204E in
40 CFR part 51, Appendix M, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04 (9), to measure the total mass, kg, of TVH emissions that are not captured by the emission capture system; they are measured as they exit the temporary total enclosure or building enclosure during each capture efficiency test run. To make the measurement, substitute TVH for each occurrence of the term VOC in the methods. Use Method 204D if the enclosure is a temporary total enclosure. Use Method 204E if the enclosure is a building enclosure. During the capture efficiency measurement, all organic compound emitting operations inside the building enclosure other than the coating operation for which capture efficiency is being determined shall be shut down, but all fans and blowers shall be operating normally.
NR 465.28(6)(b)2.d.
d. For each capture efficiency test run, determine the percent capture efficiency of the emission capture system, using the following equation:
(Equation 7)
where:
CE is the capture efficiency of the emission capture system vented to the add-on control device, percent
TVHcaptured is the total mass of TVH captured by the emission capture system as measured at the inlet to the add-on control device during the emission capture efficiency test run, kg
TVHuncaptured is the total mass of TVH that is not captured by the emission capture system and that exits from the temporary total enclosure or building enclosure during the capture efficiency test run, kg
NR 465.28(6)(b)2.e.
e. Determine the capture efficiency of the emission capture system as the average of the capture efficiencies measured in the 3 test runs.
NR 465.28(6)(b)3.
3. `Alternative capture efficiency protocol.' As an alternative to the procedures specified in
subds. 1. and
2., you may determine capture efficiency using any other capture efficiency protocol and test methods that satisfy the criteria of either the DQO or LCL approach as described in
40 CFR part 63, Subpart KK, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04 (24).
NR 465.28(7)
(7) How do I determine the add-on control device emission destruction or removal efficiency?. NR 465.28(7)(a)(a) For all types of add-on control devices, use the following test methods:
NR 465.28(7)(a)3.
3. Method 3, 3A or 3B in
40 CFR part 60, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04 (13), as appropriate, for gas analysis to determine dry molecular weight. You may also use, as an alternative to Method 3B, the manual method for measuring the oxygen, carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide content of exhaust gas in ANSI/ASME, PTC 19.10-1981, “Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses", incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.11 (6).
NR 465.28(7)(a)5.
5. Methods for determining gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, and stack gas moisture shall be performed, as applicable, during each test run.
NR 465.28(7)(b)
(b) Measure total gaseous organic mass emissions as carbon at the inlet and outlet of the add-on control device simultaneously, using either Method 25 or 25A in
40 CFR part 60, Appendix A, incorporated by reference in
s. NR 484.04 (13), and using the same method for both the inlet and outlet measurements according to the following criteria:
NR 465.28(7)(b)1.
1. Use Method 25 if the add-on control device is an oxidizer and you expect the total gaseous organic concentration as carbon to be more than 50 parts per million (ppm) at the control device outlet.
NR 465.28(7)(b)2.
2. Use Method 25A if the add-on control device is an oxidizer and you expect the total gaseous organic concentration as carbon to be 50 ppm or less at the control device outlet.
NR 465.28(7)(c)
(c) If 2 or more add-on control devices are used for the same emission stream, you shall measure emissions at the outlet of each device.
NR 465.28 Note
Note: For example, if one add-on control device is a concentrator with an outlet for the high-volume, dilute stream that has been treated by the concentrator, and a second add-on control device is an oxidizer with an outlet for the low-volume, concentrated stream that is treated with the oxidizer, you shall measure emissions at the outlet of the oxidizer and the high-volume dilute stream outlet of the concentrator.
NR 465.28(7)(d)
(d) For each test run, determine the total gaseous organic emissions mass flow rates for the inlet and the outlet of the add-on control device, using Equation 8 in this paragraph. If there is more than one inlet or outlet to the add-on control device, you shall calculate the total gaseous organic mass flow rate using Equation 8 in this paragraph for each inlet and each outlet and then total all of the inlet emissions and total all of the outlet emissions.
(Equation 8)
where:
Mf is the total gaseous organic emissions mass flow rate, kg/per hour (h)
Cc is the concentration of organic compounds as carbon in the vent gas, as determined by Method 25 or Method 25A, parts per million by volume (ppmv), dry basis
Qsd is the volumetric flow rate of gases entering or exiting the add-on control device, as determined by Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2D, 2F or 2G, dry standard cubic meters/hour (dscm/h)
0.0416 = conversion factor for molar volume, kg-moles per cubic meter (mol/m3) (at 293 Kelvin (K) and 760 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg))
NR 465.28(7)(e)
(e) For each test run, determine the add-on control device organic emissions destruction or removal efficiency, using the following equation:
(Equation 9)
where:
