Wisconsin Legislature: SS 059-17

SS 059-17

Employment Relations Commission (ERC)

Administrative Code Chapter Groups Affected:

Chs. ERC 1-9; Wisconsin Employment Peace Act

Chs. ERC 20-29; State Employment Labor Relations Act

Chs. ERC 30-39; Municipal Sector Interest Dispute Resolution Processes

Chs. ERC 40-49; WERC Roster of Ad Hoc Arbitrators and Fact Finders

Chs. ERC 50-59; Labor-Management Cooperation Services

Chs. ERC 60-69; UW Faculty and Academic Staff

Administrative Code Chapters Affected:

Ch. ERC 4 (Revised)

Ch. ERC 8 (Revised)

Ch. ERC 29 (Revised)

Ch. ERC 32 (Revised)

Ch. ERC 33 (Revised)

Ch. ERC 40 (Revised)

Ch. ERC 50 (Revised)

Ch. ERC 61 (Revised)

Ch. ERC 62 (Revised)

Ch. ERC 63 (Revised)

Ch. ERC 64 (Revised)

Ch. ERC 65 (Revised)

Ch. ERC 66 (Revised)

Ch. ERC 67 (Revised)

Related to: Update/clean pp of administrative rules given statutory changes

Date Statement Approved by Governor: July 11, 2017

Statement of Scope

WISCONSIN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

Rule No.:

ERC 4,8,29,32,33,40,50,61,62,63,64,65,66,67

Relating to:

Update/Clean Up of Administrative Rules Given Statutory Changes

Rule Type:

Permanent

1. Finding/nature of emergency (Emergency Rule only):

2. Detailed description of the objective of the proposed rule:

The Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission proposes to amend and delete existing administrative rules made obsolete by 2011 Wisconsin Act 10 and subsequent legislation.

3. Description of the existing policies relevant to the rule, new policies proposed to be included in the rule, and an analysis of policy alternatives:

None

4. Detailed explanation of statutory authority for the rule (including the statutory citation and language):

Sections 111.09(1), 111.71(1) and 111.94(1), Wis. Stats.

5. Estimate of amount of time that state employees will spend developing the rule and of other resources necessary to develop the rule:

40 hours

6. List with description of all entities that may be affected by the proposed rule:

None

7. Summary and preliminary comparison with any existing or proposed federal regulation that is intended to address the activities to be regulated by the proposed rule:

None

8. Anticipated economic impact of implementing the rule (note if the rule is likely to have a significant economic impact on small businesses):

None

Contact Person: Peter G. Davis 608 243-2421